Cookies disclaimer

I agree Our site saves small pieces of text information (cookies) on your device in order to deliver better content and for statistical purposes. You can disable the usage of cookies by changing the settings of your browser. By browsing our website without changing the browser settings you grant us permission to store that information on your device.

What Is The Thermal Conductivity Of Mastic Asphalt?

The thermal conductivity of mastic asphalt is typically 0.7–1.1 W/m·K at room temperature (≈20–25 °C). Actual thermal conductivity values for mastic asphalt shift depending on aggregate type, high filler loading, density, and temperature. Dense, near-voidless mixes and warmer conditions tend to push k toward the upper end. For design, some specifications use a single representative value (often around 0.9–1.15 W/m·K, though more conservative guides may assume ≈0.5 W/m·K). You should always use the product/EPD value; if none is available, a ~1.0 W/m·K default is prudent. You should avoid assuming ~0.5 W/m·K unless your specification mandates it. Remember, mastic asphalt isn’t an insulator. The roof or deck’s thermal resistance comes from the insulation layer, while the mastic asphalt provides waterproofing and thermal mass.

What Is Thermal Conductivity?

Thermal conductivity (k) is a material property that describes how readily heat flows through it, measured in watts per meter–kelvin (W/m·K). By Fourier’s law—q=−k∇Tq = -k \nabla Tq=−k∇T (or q=−k dT/dxq = -k\,\mathrm{d}T/\mathrm{d}xq=−kdT/dx in 1D)—a higher k means more heat passes for the same temperature gradient and area. Metals like copper and aluminium have high k (good conductors), while foams, mineral wool, and dry air have low k (good insulators). The value depends on temperature, moisture content, density, and microstructure; added moisture usually raises k, and closed pores generally lower it. Some materials are anisotropic, conducting heat better in one direction than another, and composites can show layer-dependent behavior. Common test methods include guarded hot plate and heat-flow meter (steady-state), and laser flash or transient plane source (transient). For design, conductivity links to thermal resistance R=thickness/kR = \text{thickness}/kR=thickness/k and to U-value U=1/RU = 1/RU=1/R for assemblies.
Knowing k helps engineers choose materials for insulation, heat sinks, fire protection, and temperature control in buildings, electronics, and many other systems.

Why Is Thermal Conductivity Important For Mastic Asphalt?

Thermal conductivity (k) governs how quickly heat flows through the mastic asphalt, shaping heat-up/cool-down rates, temperature gradients, and whether the binder approaches its softening range in hot sun. Because mastic asphalt has a moderate k, it acts as thermal mass rather than insulation—so you must add a separate insulation layer and still include the asphalt’s k and thickness in U-value and thermal-bridge calculations. k also interacts with finish choice and binder/mix selection. Higher-solar reflective indexes and lighter finishes  slow heat gain. Whereas binder/mix selection prevents flow, ridging, and temperature-driven cracking. It informs detailing and moisture control too—good priming, vapour strategy, and solid substrate support minimise blistering and stresses from thermal gradients transmitted through the dense layer.

  1. Heat flow & temperature gradients
  2. Thermal mass adds insulation
  3. Finish choice & SRI effects
  4. Heat-stable mix design
  5. Detailing & vapour management

1. Heat Flow & Temperature Gradients

Thermal conductivity (k) governs how fast heat moves through the layer and therefore how steep the temperature gradient is from the hot surface to the cooler substrate. As a feel for scale: a dark deck at 65 °C with the substrate at 25 °C across 20 mm gives a gradient of roughly 2,000 K/m, which can drive differential expansion and subtle movement at edges and details. Higher k dissipates heat faster (shallower gradients), while lower k holds steeper gradients for longer; mastic asphalt sits mid-range, so gradients are noticeable but not extreme. Gradients also depend on boundary conditions—solar gain (SRI/colour), wind, shading, and rainfall quench—so finish choice can lower the surface temperature before conduction even begins. Finally, moisture matters: a damp substrate raises effective k locally and can promote blistering when heated, so dry, primed, fully supported bases are essential.

2. Thermal Mass Adds Insulation

With moderate k and high density, mastic asphalt behaves as thermal mass, not an insulator. A typical 20 mm layer at ~2.35 t/m³ weighs ~47 kg/m²; with a heat capacity ~0.9 kJ/kg·K, that’s ~42 kJ/m²·K of heat storage—useful for time-lag and smoothing peaks. But its thermal resistance is tiny: R≈0.021.0=0.02 m2K/WR \approx \frac{0.02}{1.0} = 0.02 \,\mathrm{m^2K/W}R≈1.00.02​=0.02m2K/W (assuming k ≈ 1.0 W/m·K), so it contributes almost nothing to a roof target like U = 0.20 W/m²K (which needs R≈5 m2K/WR \approx 5 \,\mathrm{m^2K/W}R≈5m2K/W). You therefore still need a separate insulation layer, and you must include the asphalt’s k and thickness in U-value and thermal-bridge checks (parapets, thresholds, fixings). In hygrothermal/condensation assessments, treat the asphalt as a dense, low-permeability layer with high heat capacity—great for stability, but the insulation does the real thermal lifting.

3. Finish Choice & SRI Effects

Thermal conductivity (k) is fixed by the mix, but you can change the boundary condition—how much sun the surface absorbs—by choosing a higher-SRI finish. Well-embedded light chippings or solar-reflective coatings typically cut peak surface temperatures by ~10–20 °C (finish and soiling dependent), lowering the thermal load that drives flow and indentation. Specify initial and aged SRI, check slip/skid resistance (e.g., BS 7976 pendulum values), and include a simple cleaning/recoating plan so reflectance—and the benefit—persist. If a dark aesthetic is required, use tinted cool coatings or higher-reflectance chip blends to lift SRI without changing the look. SRI doesn’t change k, but it reduces the heat the layer must conduct, keeping the asphalt within a safer temperature range.

4. Heat-Stable Mix Design

Select binder grade/softening point, consider polymer modification (e.g., SBS) where exposure is high, and tune the filler-to-binder ratio so the mastic remains stable at expected deck temperatures. For hot, trafficked areas, aiming toward the upper softening-point band of mastic asphalt (~95–105 °C) with a balanced filler level improves resistance to warm-weather flow, ridging, and surface marking. Verify performance with service-relevant tests: static indentation around 60 °C, plus creep/wheel-tracking where rolling or sustained loads apply; adjust local thickness at ramps, nosings, and turning zones. If handling becomes too stiff at laydown temperatures, fine-tune filler, temperature window, or consider a PM binder to keep workability without sacrificing stability. This ties thermal exposure to mix behaviour, keeping the layer inside its safe operating window.

5. Detailing & Vapour Management

Good detailing prevents thermal/moisture effects from turning into defects. Prime and lay only onto dry, fully supported substrates and treat mastic asphalt as effectively vapour-tight, integrating it with the project’s VCL strategy to avoid trapped moisture and blistering under heat. Detail upstands, penetrations, movement joints, and outlets to accommodate expansion and maintain continuous airtight/watertight barriers; carry structural joints through the asphalt rather than forcing it to bridge movement. Over soft insulation, add high-density protection boards to spread point loads and limit deformation amplified by thermal cycling, and ensure falls/drainage so ponding doesn’t raise surface temperatures. Early QA—temperature logs, bulk-density checks near MTD, and inspection of edges/thresholds—catches issues before they propagate.

In Which Situations Is Thermal Conductivity Vital For Mastic Asphalt?

Thermal conductivity is vital on sun-exposed mastic asphalt applications such as balconies, roofs, ramps, and dark south/west aspects. In these circumstances heat-up rates and surface–substrate temperature gradients drive the risk of softening, flow, and indentation. It matters in U-value and thermal-bridge calculations: mastic asphalt is thermal mass, not insulation, so you must include its k and thickness while relying on a separate insulation layer for compliance. It’s key when choosing finishes and mixes—pair k with higher-SRI (cooler) finishes and suitable softening-point/mix design so the layer stays below critical temperatures. And it’s crucial over softer substrates or moist decks, where thermal gradients and trapped vapour can cause blistering—demanding good priming, a sound vapour strategy, and load-spreading boards.

  1. Sun-exposed or dark decks: manage heat-up/gradients to prevent softening and indentation.
  2. Envelope calculations: include k × thickness in U-values and thermal-bridge checks.
  3. Finish & mix specification: pair high-SRI finishes with an appropriate softening point/mix.
  4. Soft or damp substrates: ensure priming, VCL, and load-spreading to avoid blistering/deformation.

1. Sun-Exposed or Dark Decks

Dark, south/west-facing  mastic asphalt surfaces can run 10–25 °C hotter than ambient air, creating steep surface–substrate gradients across a thin (e.g., 20 mm) layer. Those gradients soften the binder and increase risks of flow, ridging, and indentation, particularly on slopes, thresholds, and turning zones. This can be mitigated by specifying high-SRI finishes (light chippings or reflective coatings). These solutions to increase SRI are frequently seen on asphalt roofing, steps and flooring. Selecting a higher softening-point (and PM binder if needed), and using local thickening or tougher wearing finishes at hotspots. On mastic asphalt roofing it is important to keep drainage clear as ponding prolongs heating. Hard bridges should also be avoided at perimeters which concentrate shear. Quick IR spot checks during hot spells will reveal the warmest areas so you can target detailing and maintenance where it matters most.

2. Envelope Calculations (U-Values & Thermal Bridges)

Treat mastic asphalt as thermal mass with modest resistance, and include its k×thickness in all heat-loss and junction calculations. A typical 20 mm layer with k≈1.0 W/m⋅Kk≈1.0\ \mathrm{W/m·K}k≈1.0 W/m⋅K adds only R≈0.02 m2K/WR≈0.02\ \mathrm{m^2K/W}R≈0.02 m2K/W, but omitting it skews U-values and ψ-values at parapets, upstands, thresholds, and fixings where small errors compound. Use the product/EPD λ at the relevant temperature (conductivity rises with temperature); if unknown, a prudent default of ~1.0 W/m·K avoids over-crediting insulation. Model key junctions in 2D/3D where necessary to capture the asphalt’s continuity and any metal penetrations, then coordinate insulation thickness, VCL placement, and detailing to hit targets. As a final check, review surface temperatures and condensation risk at interiors—accurate inputs here prevent cold-spot issues later.

3. Finish & Mix Specification (High-SRI + Softening Point)

You can’t change k, but you can cut heat input: specify high-SRI finishes (well-embedded light chippings or compatible reflective coatings) and require initial and aged SRI plus verified slip/skid resistance. Pair the finish with an appropriate softening point (often in the upper band for exposed/sloped areas), balanced filler-to-binder ratio, and polymer modification (e.g., SBS) if needed to keep stability at service temperatures. Prove the recipe with static indentation at ~60 °C and, where rolling or sustained loads apply, creep/wheel-tracking; use trial panels to check lay-down temperature window, pot life, edge hold, and finish quality. If handling becomes too stiff, first fine-tune filler and lay-down temperature before stepping down binder hardness; keep kettle temps/hold times within the supplier’s limits to avoid binder ageing that can mask an over-hard mix.

4. Soft or Damp Substrates (Priming, VCL, Load-Spreading)

Moisture and low substrate stiffness amplify thermal issues, leading to blistering, debonding, and deformation under heat. Prime only onto dry, fully supported bases (verify with moisture/RH checks) and integrate the asphalt into a continuous vapour control layer (VCL) strategy—carry the VCL through upstands, penetrations, and joints to avoid trapped vapour. Over insulation or softer decks, add high-density protection boards with suitable compressive strength and creep resistance to spread point loads at trolleys, pedestals, and plant legs; avoid voids and hard bridges at perimeters. Maintain falls and clear drainage so ponding and prolonged wetting don’t raise deck temperatures or drive vapour; inspect outlets, thresholds, and terminations early to confirm airtight, watertight continuity.

How Can You Improve The Thermal Conductivity Of Mastic Asphalt Applications?

You can’t meaningfully change the thermal conductivity (k) of mastic asphalt itself. “Improving” thermal performance means reducing heat flow and peak surface temperatures at the application level. Do the heavy lifting with a separate, continuous insulation layer and fix thermal bridges at parapets, thresholds, and fixings so U-values are met. Cut solar heat input using high-SRI, light finishes (or reflective coatings), plus shading/ventilation where possible—and keep them clean so SRI stays high. Mix tweaks (aggregate/filler) only nudge k slightly; instead use asphalt thickness for thermal mass/time-lag, rely on insulation for R-value, and keep substrates dry/primed to avoid moisture-driven heat flow and blistering.

  1. Continuous insulation + bridge control: meet U-values; treat parapets, thresholds, and fixings.
  2. Cut solar gain: high-SRI chips/coatings, shading/ventilation, and regular cleaning.
  3. Focus on assembly, not k: mix tweaks barely change conductivity.
  4. Exploit mass; keep bases dry: use thickness for time-lag; prime and dry substrates to prevent moisture/blistering.

1. Continuous Insulation + Bridge Control

Use a continuous insulation layer to meet your U-value target, and model the asphalt’s k × thickness so junctions are accurate. Treat linear and point thermal bridges at parapets, thresholds, balcony edges, and fixings with upstand insulation, thermal break plates, and careful bracket details. Where risk is high, run 2D/3D calculations to confirm Ψ-values and tweak thickness or detailing. Keep the VCL/airtightness continuous through corners and penetrations so thermal and moisture performance match the design intent.

2. Cut Solar Gain

Lower the heat arriving at the surface with high-SRI finishes: well-embedded light chippings or compatible reflective coatings. Add shading/ventilation where feasible, and specify initial and aged SRI with a simple plan for cleaning/recoating to keep reflectance up. Confirm slip/skid resistance for walkways, ramps, and car parks so safety isn’t traded for reflectance. Cooler surfaces keep the binder stiffer, reducing flow, marking, and temperature-driven distress.

3. Focus on Assembly, Not k

You can’t meaningfully shift the asphalt’s thermal conductivity with small mix tweaks, so improve thermal performance at the assembly level. Prioritise insulation thickness, airtightness/VCL continuity, and surface reflectance; use product/EPD λ values for correct calculations. Select binder softening point and detailing for the temperatures the deck will actually see, rather than trying to “tune” k. Treat mastic asphalt as waterproofing and thermal mass, not insulation.

4. Exploit Mass; Keep Bases Dry

Extra thickness adds thermal mass/time-lag, smoothing temperature swings—but it doesn’t replace insulation, so right-size rather than overspec. Lay only on dry, fully supported, primed substrates and integrate a proper VCL to avoid vapour-driven blistering under heat. Maintain falls and clear drainage so ponding doesn’t prolong high temperatures or wetting. Over insulation or softer decks, use high-density boards to spread loads and limit deformation amplified by thermal cycling.