I agree Our site saves small pieces of text information (cookies) on your device in order to deliver better content and for statistical purposes. You can disable the usage of cookies by changing the settings of your browser. By browsing our website without changing the browser settings you grant us permission to store that information on your device.
The mineral filler fraction of mastic asphalt is normally 20–30% by weight of the total mix. The mineral filler fraction is the ultra-fine portion generally passing ~0.063 mm and most often consists of ground limestone or dolomite. The exact mineral filler percentage of mastic asphalt varies with application, aggregate grading, and local specificaitons. Mastic asphalt roofing mixes may push filler content higher for body and slump control. whereas paving and flooring grades may reduce the mineral filler fraction for workability and wear.
The 20–30% figure for the mineral filler fraction of mastic asphalt refers to the whole mix; within the binder–mastic (binder + filler), the filler typically accounts for 60–70% by mass. Mix designers tune performance by balancing filler and binder rather than chasing a single percentage. The filler should be clean, dry, and low in clay; hydrated lime is sometimes added to improve moisture resistance. Polymer-modified binders can shift the optimum filler level. Too much filler risks brittleness and thermal cracking, while too little can cause excessive flow or bleeding.
Mineral filler fraction is the ultra-fine mineral portion of an asphalt mix, the particles small enough to pass a 0.063 mm sieve. The mineral filler blends with bitumen to form the mastic. Common fillers are finely ground limestone or dolomite (sometimes with hydrated lime), chosen for clean, dry, clay-free properties. In mastic asphalt, the filler content is comparatively high, typically about 20–30% of the total mix by mass, because the system is laid dense and essentially voidless. Within the binder and mastic phase itself, filler usually dominates. This is often ~60–70% by mass to control viscosity and flow. Functionally, filler stiffens the binder, improves deformation and indentation resistance, and helps keep the material stable during laying on warm surfaces. Too little filler can cause excessive flow or bleeding, while too much can make the mix brittle and prone to thermal cracking. Designers set the filler fraction through sieve analysis and a targeted filler-to-binder ratio, tuned to application, climate, and performance specifications.
The mineral filler fraction is critical because it sets the rheology of the mastic asphalt. Getting the filler-to-binder balance right gives enough viscosity for easy laying without slump on falls and warm surfaces. It largely determines mechanical performance: more filler generally boosts stiffness and resistance to deformation/indentation, while too little risks flow/bleeding and too much can make the mix brittle and crack-prone. It helps achieve a dense, near-voidless layer for reliable waterproofing and a smooth, durable finish.
Finally, it’s the main tuning lever for climate and duty: high-heat or heavy-traffic areas may need a slightly higher filler (or harder binder), whereas colder conditions demand a more balanced ratio to preserve toughness.
The filler-to-binder ratio sets both yield stress and plastic viscosity, so the mix spreads under the trowel yet holds shape without slumping on warm decks or steep falls. Filler grading and specific surface area matter: well-graded, fine limestone/dolomite (and small hydrated-lime additions) thicken the mastic more efficiently than coarse or dusty filler. Temperature and holding time in the kettle shift the workability window—hotter/longer holding reduces viscosity, so slightly higher filler may be needed to retain edge stability. Too little filler gives a loose, “greasy” mastic that runs at details and drags at arrises; too much makes it pasty, raising trowel effort and risking cold seams or poor finish. Aim for a filler-to-binder balance proven by trial panels and monitored by lay-down temperature and pot-life checks.
Higher filler content increases stiffness and indentation resistance (e.g., static indentation at elevated temperature), improving performance under footfall, trolley wheels, and small base plates. Filler also reduces creep/flow at service temperatures, but excessive filler can embrittle the matrix, raising crack risk at nosings, upstands, or during cold snaps. Particle shape and mineralogy influence results: angular, harder fillers boost resistance more than soft, rounded ones, while hydrated lime can improve moisture tolerance and long-term stability. The sweet spot depends on duty and climate; polymer-modified binders can let you run a slightly lower filler level while maintaining high-temperature stability. Validate the target fraction with service-relevant tests (indentation at 60 °C, creep/wheel-tracking where applicable) and confirm on site via density checks and early inspections in high-load paths.
Fine, well-graded filler packs micro-voids between sand and aggregate, producing a near-voidless, waterproof matrix that sharply reduces moisture pathways. The effect depends on filler grading and specific surface area: tighter grading and higher surface area raise paste density and seal micro-porosity, supporting a smoother, longer-lasting wearing or sand-rub finish and better chip retention where used. In practice, aim for bulk density within ~1–3% of maximum theoretical density (MTD); hitting this signals good continuity and low permeability. Because low porosity also limits vapour escape, substrates must be dry, primed, and fully supported to avoid blistering—continuity is an asset only when preparation is sound. Verify outcomes with core density checks, visual inspection of seams/arrises, and (where relevant) simple water-tightness or pull-off adhesion checks at details.
In hot, high-traffic zones (balconies, ramps, steps, plant routes), slightly higher filler and/or a harder or polymer-modified binder improve high-temperature stability and reduce indentation; reflective chips/coatings can also cut peak deck temperatures. In colder climates or movement-prone substrates, a more moderate filler level with a binder of higher penetration preserves toughness and lowers crack risk at arrises and upstands. For localized stress points (nosings, thresholds, tight turns), combine filler/binder tuning with local thickening, tougher wearing finishes, and load-spreading boards rather than over-specifying entire areas. Always set service-temperature acceptance criteria (e.g., static indentation at 60 °C within a defined limit, plus creep/wheel-tracking where relevant) and confirm with supplier data or trial panels. Finally, coordinate the mix choice with substrate stiffness, movement joints, and detailing so material properties and structural behaviour work together, not against each other.
The mineral filler fraction in mastic asphalt is usually 20–30% by mass, but the optimum shifts with duty, climate, and binder choice. Roofs and below-grade tanking tend to the lower–mid 20s to keep flow and ease of laying while maintaining edge stability. Steps, walkways, ramps, and access routes often push to the upper 20s to boost stiffness and static-indentation resistance at nosings and turning zones. Bridge decks and multi-storey car parks also sit toward the upper 20s for high-temperature stability and creep control; harder or polymer-modified binders can permit slightly less filler for the same performance, so always verify with service-temperature tests (e.g., static indentation at 60 °C).
For mastic asphalt roofing and below-grade tanking, a filler fraction in the lower–mid 20% range preserves flow so the mastic spreads cleanly and seals details without slumping. This balance gives stable edges at upstands and penetrations while remaining workable across large areas. The aim is a dense, near-voidless layer for waterproofing rather than maximum stiffness. Too little filler risks run-off on warm decks; too much can feel pasty and make finishing difficult. Prove the choice with trial panels and check static indentation at service temperatures.
Steps and walkways see concentrated footfall and turning at nosings and landings. For walkways and asphalt steps mixes often use upper-20% filler to raise stiffness and indentation resistance. The higher filler improves rutting control and reduces ridging in warm conditions. Pair this with tougher wearing or sand-rub finishes and consider local thickening at high-traffic paths. Keep substrates stiff and fully supported to avoid punch-through. Verify performance with density checks and static indentation at around 60 °C.
Slopes increase the risk of slumping during lay-down, so ramps and access routes benefit from upper-20% filler to stabilize flow on gradients. The added stiffness helps resist wheel marking from trolleys and repeated footfall. Combine with good falls and drainage so heat and ponding don’t soften the surface. Use perimeter isolation and load-spreading where small hard wheels are common. Confirm behaviour with creep or wheel-tracking data in addition to indentation tests.
Bridge decks and car park areas face wheel loads, thermal cycling, and de-icing salts, so mixes typically target the upper-20% filler bracket for high-temperature stability and creep control. Polymer-modified binders may allow a slightly lower filler while maintaining performance, but this must be confirmed by testing. Increase thickness or reinforcement at ramps, tight turns, and wheel-stop zones. Detail joints and edges robustly to resist shear and scuffing. Plan periodic inspections and maintenance to manage localized wear.
Hot climates or long dwell loads (e.g., parked equipment) often call for slightly higher filler and/or harder or polymer-modified binders for stability. In colder conditions, moderating the filler helps retain toughness and reduce crack risk at arrises and upstands. Binder grade interacts with filler: a stronger binder can sometimes meet targets with a touch less filler. Aggregate grading and hydrated-lime additions further fine-tune workability and moisture tolerance. Always validate the chosen balance with service-temperature tests such as static indentation at 60 °C.