I agree Our site saves small pieces of text information (cookies) on your device in order to deliver better content and for statistical purposes. You can disable the usage of cookies by changing the settings of your browser. By browsing our website without changing the browser settings you grant us permission to store that information on your device.
The acoustic performance contribution of mastic asphalt typically ranges from about +2 to +5 dB for airborne sound insulation (Rw/STC) and 0 to 2 dB for impact sound reduction (ΔLw) when used on its own. As a dense 20–25 mm topping (~45–60 kg/m²), it aids airborne sound mainly through added mass and airtightness; it is not a resilient layer. For meaningful impact isolation, combine it with a resilient underlay or a floating floor. Complete assemblies commonly achieve ΔLw ~15–25 dB, with the asphalt supplying mass/durability and the resilient layer providing isolation. Actual results depend on the whole build-up and control of flanking paths.
An acoustic performance rating tells you how well a product or building system controls sound—either blocking it, reducing impact noise, or absorbing it. Common metrics include STC/Rw for airborne sound insulation, ΔLw/IIC for impact sound (footfall), and NRC/SAA for sound absorption. As a rule of thumb, higher STC/Rw and ΔLw/IIC numbers mean better isolation, while NRC ranges from 0 to 1 with higher values absorbing more sound. These ratings are usually measured in laboratories to published standards; field ratings (e.g., FSTC, FIIC) are often lower due to real-world flanking paths. Always interpret the number in context—the full assembly, detailing, and installation quality typically matter more than any single material’s rating.
Acoustic performance matters for mastic asphalt because its high mass and airtightness can meaningfully boost airborne sound insulation in floors and roofs. It also highlights a limitation: on its own it offers little impact sound isolation, so designers must pair it with a resilient layer or floating floor where footfall noise is a concern. Understanding its rating helps you meet building regulations and acoustic targets without over-engineering the rest of the build-up. It guides thickness, finish, and detailing choices (e.g., joints, upstands) to avoid flanking paths that can undermine real-world results.
Mass law says heavier, denser layers block more airborne sound, gaining roughly 6 dB of transmission loss for each doubling of surface mass (all else equal). A 20–25 mm mastic asphalt topping delivers high surface mass, so it meaningfully boosts Rw/STC when added to floors or roofs. Thickness matters, but so does continuity—gaps, cracks, or poorly sealed joints can erase mass-law gains. For best results, pair the asphalt with a decoupled ceiling or cavity insulation to push performance well beyond what mass alone can achieve.
Air leaks are the enemy of airborne sound insulation, often undoing the benefit of added mass. Mastic asphalt forms a continuous, voidless layer that naturally limits leakage, improving real-world results versus layered but leaky build-ups. Pay special attention at perimeters, upstands, service penetrations, and thresholds—seal and detail these as rigorously as the field area. Treat the asphalt as both a mass layer and an acoustic air seal, coordinating with adjacent membranes and trims to maintain continuity.
On its own, mastic asphalt offers little impact-sound isolation because it is stiff and non-resilient. To control footfall noise, specify a resilient underlay or a full floating system so the asphalt provides mass while the resilient layer supplies decoupling. Avoid rigid “bridges” at edges, door thresholds, and fixings, and use perimeter isolation strips to preserve the system’s ΔLw/IIC performance. Set clear impact-noise targets at design stage and verify the complete assembly against tested data, not just the asphalt layer.
Start by identifying the exact acoustic metrics and thresholds that apply (e.g., minimum Rw/STC for airborne sound and ΔLw/IIC for impact). Design to a margin—typically 2–3 dB above the target—to account for field variability versus lab data. Choose assemblies with published, credible test reports that match your build-up closely (thicknesses, layers, and junction types). Plan verification: include site QA checks and, where required, post-completion acoustic testing to prove compliance.
Balance the four levers of acoustic design: mass, decoupling, absorption, and damping—don’t rely on mass alone. Use mastic asphalt for mass and airtightness, then add a resilient layer or suspended ceiling to achieve bigger gains cost-effectively. Select insulation with good acoustic absorption where cavities exist (e.g., mineral wool) and avoid rigid bridges that defeat decoupling. Right-size thicknesses to avoid diminishing returns while respecting structural load, build height, and programme.
Most failures come from sound “leaking” around the assembly, not through it, so treat edges and penetrations as critical. Use continuous perimeter isolation strips, seal the asphalt to upstands, and maintain airtightness at thresholds and service entries. Isolate rigid elements (stairs, balustrades, pipework) from the primary structure to stop vibration short-circuiting the system. Coordinate drawings and site inspections to ensure junction details are built exactly as specified.
There are several practical ways to tweak the mastic asphalt layer or its build-up to lift acoustic ratings. Increasing the asphalt thickness raises surface mass and typically delivers a measurable airborne sound (Rw/STC) gain under mass law. Specifying slightly denser aggregates or fillers (e.g., basalt-rich blends instead of lighter limestone) nudges mass upward and helps further. Using polymer-modified binders or fibre reinforcement can limit micro-cracking and keep the layer airtight over time, improving real-world airborne performance. Laying the asphalt as a floating screed over a resilient acoustic underlay (crumb rubber, cork–rubber, or mineral-wool boards) with perimeter isolation strips substantially improves impact noise (ΔLw/IIC). A two-coat asphalt build with a thin viscoelastic mat or acoustic membrane between coats adds constrained-layer damping, reducing footfall “ring.” Staggering joints and meticulously sealing penetrations and edges preserves airtightness and prevents flanking; paired with a decoupled ceiling beneath, the overall assembly can achieve markedly higher acoustic ratings.